The management of unpaid debts represents one of the most delicate challenges for businesses and professionals, but also for private citizens. When amicable attempts do not yield the desired result, recourse to the judicial authority becomes a necessary step to protect one's financial rights. As an expert lawyer in debt collection in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci understands that the client's main concern at this stage often revolves around the relationship between the costs to be incurred and the concrete possibilities of recovering the sums owed.
Facing a debt collection proceeding requires not only technical expertise but also a preliminary strategic assessment. It is not simply a matter of filing a document, but of understanding whether the legal action will lead to actual collection or if it risks becoming an additional cost without benefit.
The payment order (decreto ingiuntivo) is a procedural tool provided for by our legal system to allow creditors to quickly obtain an enforceable title, i.e., a court order directed at the debtor to pay a specific sum within 40 days. To obtain it, it is necessary to provide written proof of the debt (such as invoices, contracts, or acknowledgments of debt).
When discussing costs related to a payment order at the Court of Milan, it is essential to distinguish between two distinct types of expenses: out-of-pocket expenses and professional fees.
Out-of-pocket expenses are fixed costs imposed by the State for access to justice. These mainly include the Unified Contribution (Contributo Unificato), the amount of which varies in tiers based on the value of the debt to be recovered, and the revenue stamp for lump-sum advances. Added to these are the costs for serving documents on the debtor and registration taxes subsequent to the issuance of the order. These sums must be advanced by the creditor but are recoverable from the debtor in case of a positive outcome of the procedure.
Regarding legal assistance, it is impossible to define a standard cost a priori that is valid for every situation. The determination of the financial commitment depends on multiple variables: the complexity of the documentation to be examined, the value of the dispute, and any specific procedural difficulties that may arise. Furthermore, the debtor's behavior (e.g., whether they file an opposition or not) can radically alter the procedural path.
The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, an expert lawyer in civil law and debt collection in Milan, is characterized by transparency and practicality. Before initiating any payment order procedure, the firm conducts a preliminary analysis of the debtor's solvency. This step is crucial: obtaining a piece of paper ordering payment is useless if the counterparty has no assets.
The firm's strategy involves a clear and detailed estimate provided to the client after the initial consultation. At this meeting, Avv. Marco Bianucci explains not only the foreseeable costs but also the risks and realistic timelines of the Court of Milan. The goal is not to initiate a lawsuit at all costs, but to maximize the economic outcome for the client by carefully evaluating the cost-benefit ratio of each legal action.
Initial costs include out-of-pocket expenses (Unified Contribution and revenue stamps), which vary based on the amount of the debt, and an advance on professional fees. During the preliminary consultation, Avv. Marco Bianucci will provide a precise breakdown of these expenses based on the specific value of your debt, ensuring maximum transparency before the case is initiated.
In principle, the judge, by issuing the payment order, orders the debtor to pay not only the principal sum and interest but also the legal fees and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the creditor. However, the actual recovery of these sums depends on the debtor's financial capacity and the success of the subsequent enforcement phase.
If the debtor files an opposition within 40 days of service, an ordinary civil lawsuit is opened to ascertain the existence of the debt. In this case, the timelines are extended, and the procedural strategy must be adapted. Avv. Marco Bianucci's experience in civil litigation in Milan allows for managing this phase as well, defending the creditor's rights against opposing claims.
Timelines can vary depending on the workload of the competent section of the Court. Generally, the summary proceeding is faster than an ordinary lawsuit. However, to get a realistic estimate based on the current timelines of the Milanese forum, it is advisable to assess the specific case during a consultation.
If your company or personal assets are at risk due to non-payment, it is crucial to act promptly and strategically. Do not let time make your debt uncollectible. Contact Avv. Marco Bianucci to schedule a consultation at the Milan office. Together, we will analyze the documentation and define the most effective and sustainable path for recovering the sums owed to you.