The discovery of infidelity represents one of the most painful and destabilizing moments in a couple's life. Beyond emotional suffering, pressing questions inevitably arise about the practical and economic consequences of the breakup. One of the most frequent questions we are asked concerns precisely the impact of infidelity on the post-marital economic settlement: does the unfaithful spouse still have the right to receive financial support? As an experienced family law attorney in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci deeply understands the delicacy of these situations and the need to clarify a topic often surrounded by myths and inaccurate information.
In our legal system, the violation of the marital duty of fidelity does not lead to absolute automatic consequences but can result in the so-called attribution of separation. Attribution is a judicial ruling that declares the end of the marriage to be attributable to the culpable conduct of one of the spouses. For infidelity to lead to attribution, however, it is necessary to demonstrate the causal link: the infidelity must have been the triggering cause of the marital crisis, not the consequence of a relationship already irreparably compromised. If it is ascertained that infidelity has made the continuation of cohabitation intolerable, the economic repercussions are significant.
The main consequence of attribution due to infidelity is the loss of the right to a maintenance allowance. The spouse to whom the separation is attributed, even if economically weaker, will not be able to claim an allowance aimed at ensuring the same standard of living enjoyed during the marriage. It is crucial, however, to distinguish between a maintenance allowance and an alimentary allowance. The latter, of a much smaller amount and intended for mere survival, is still due to the spouse in a state of actual need, regardless of fault or infidelity. Furthermore, attribution entails the loss of succession rights towards the other spouse.
Dealing with a separation caused by infidelity requires a clear and rigorous legal strategy. The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, an experienced family law attorney in Milan, is based on a meticulous analysis of the evidence and the marital context. It is not enough to claim to have been betrayed; it is necessary to build a solid evidentiary framework that demonstrates how the spouse's conduct violated marital duties in a serious manner. The firm assists its clients in evaluating the sustainability of the attribution claim, analyzing messaging, testimonies, and documentation, always in full compliance with privacy regulations.
As a divorce lawyer, Avv. Marco Bianucci works to protect the client's economic interests, whether it is defending the betrayed spouse who wishes to avoid paying undue maintenance, or assisting someone who, despite having made mistakes, risks being denied fundamental rights due to a distorted representation of the marital crisis. The goal is always to achieve the fairest solution, prioritizing consensual agreements where possible to avoid long and painful legal battles, but remaining ready to defend the client's rights in court with firmness.
No, mere suspicion is not sufficient. To obtain attribution of separation and the consequent exclusion of the maintenance allowance, concrete proof of infidelity must be provided. This evidence must be legally obtained and must demonstrate that the infidelity was the actual cause of the marriage breakdown.
Generally no. The attribution of separation concerns the relationship between the spouses and does not affect parental capacity. Infidelity, in itself, does not make a parent unfit. Child custody is decided solely based on their moral and material interests, except in cases where the parent's conduct has caused direct harm to the offspring.
Yes, jurisprudence increasingly recognizes the evidentiary value of messages, emails, and social network interactions, provided they were not obtained by seriously violating another's privacy (e.g., by forcibly obtaining access credentials). It is the lawyer's task to assess the admissibility and relevance of such evidence in the specific context of the proceedings.
If it can be proven that the marital crisis predated the infidelity and that the couple had already lost all forms of spiritual and material communion, the judge may not pronounce attribution. In this case, the infidelity would be considered a consequence of the crisis and not its cause, and the right to maintenance could be preserved.
The dynamics related to infidelity and maintenance are complex, and every detail can make a difference in the outcome of a separation. If you are facing the end of your marriage and have doubts about the economic consequences of infidelity, it is essential to rely on a competent professional. Contact Avv. Marco Bianucci for an in-depth assessment of your case. Studio Legale Bianucci welcomes you at its Milan office, located at Via Alberto da Giussano 26, to define the most suitable strategy for protecting your interests and your future.