Receiving notification of a precautionary seizure order for one's industrial plant due to alleged exceeding of emission limits represents a moment of profound crisis for any business. The sudden interruption of production activities not only threatens the company's economic stability but also exposes company management to complex legal proceedings. In these situations, the timeliness and precision of legal intervention are decisive factors in limiting damages.
As an expert lawyer in criminal law in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci perfectly understands the urgency of restoring business continuity while rigorously addressing the challenges raised by the Judicial Authority. The primary objective is to protect the rights of the company and its directors through impeccable and targeted technical defense aimed at the rapid resolution of the critical situation.
The regulation of atmospheric emissions in Italy is strictly governed by Legislative Decree 152/2006, known as the Environmental Consolidated Act. This complex legislation establishes emission limit values, sampling criteria, and the necessary requirements for obtaining and maintaining environmental permits, such as the Integrated Environmental Authorization (AIA) or the Single Environmental Authorization (AUA).
When control bodies, such as ARPA, detect an exceedance of tabular limits or a violation of permit requirements, the Public Prosecutor can request the Judge for Preliminary Investigations to issue a precautionary seizure order. This precautionary measure aims to prevent the free availability of the plant from aggravating or prolonging the consequences of the alleged environmental crime. The practical result is the sealing of the plant or the entire facility, leading to a paralysis of production.
Managing criminal proceedings for environmental crimes requires a timely and profoundly multidisciplinary strategy. The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, a criminal lawyer in Milan with consolidated experience in corporate defense, is structured in several crucial phases aimed at protecting the client's position.
The first step involves an in-depth and immediate analysis of the investigation documents, sampling reports, and the seizure order itself. It is essential to verify the formal and substantive correctness of the measurements taken by the competent bodies, as any procedural defects in sampling or laboratory analysis can form the basis for a timely request for review to the Court of Liberty to obtain the annulment of the precautionary measure.
Subsequently, the Bianucci Law Firm collaborates in close synergy with technical consultants of proven expertise in the field of environmental engineering and chemistry. This alliance between legal defense and technical investigation is essential to demonstrate the adequacy of the plants, the potential accidental and non-negligent nature of the exceedance, or the absence of a concrete danger to public health and the environment. Based on these technical and legal elements, a request for release from seizure is structured, possibly conditional on the execution of technological adaptation interventions, to allow the resumption of production activities in full compliance with the law.
Precautionary seizure is a precautionary measure that physically removes the availability of the plant or facility from its owners. The judiciary's objective is to block the activity to prevent the continuation of the pollution crime. This involves the immediate halt of production until the Judge orders the revocation of the measure, following a defense request or the cessation of precautionary needs.
The Environmental Consolidated Act provides for penalties that vary depending on the severity of the conduct, the type of plant, and the classification of the emitted substances. Penalties for individuals (directors, legal representatives) can include arrest up to one year or significant monetary fines. Furthermore, for companies, there is the serious risk of disqualifying and monetary sanctions pursuant to Legislative Decree 231/2001 on the administrative liability of entities.
Yes, criminal procedure provides for the possibility of requesting authorization from the Judicial Authority for the temporary use of seized plants, solely and exclusively for the purpose of carrying out the technical interventions necessary to bring emissions back within strict legal limits. Once the technological adaptation is completed, tested, and certified, the defense will submit a formal request for definitive release from seizure and the full return of the facility to the company.
Defense in such cases is based on the timely appointment of party technical consultants. These experts will analyze the sampling methodologies and analysis protocols used by the control bodies. If it is demonstrated that the public measurements did not comply with the strict technical regulations of the sector, it is possible to validly contest the evidentiary data, thereby invalidating the premises for seizure and the entire accusation.
Facing the seizure of a production plant requires maximum readiness, deep technical expertise, and a solid defense strategy. Do not let a precautionary measure irreparably compromise the future of your business and your employees.
Contact Avv. Marco Bianucci for a careful and confidential assessment of your case. The Bianucci Law Firm is located in Milan, at Via Alberto da Giussano, 26, and is ready to analyze the investigation documentation to identify the fastest and most effective procedural path, with the aim of protecting your rights and restoring your company's full operational capacity.