In the complex landscape of construction and entrepreneurship in Milan, time plays a crucial role. When a real estate project or the launch of a commercial activity is stalled by the inertia of the Public Administration, the economic consequences can be devastating. Waiting beyond legal deadlines to obtain a building permit or the completion of a SCIA (Certified Notification of Start of Activity) is not just a bureaucratic inconvenience, but a true pathology in the relationship between citizens and institutions that generates tangible damages. As a lawyer specializing in compensation for damages in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci deeply understands the frustration and financial losses arising from these stalemates, offering targeted protection to those whose legitimate interests are compromised by unjustified waiting times.
The Italian legal system, through the normative evolution of Law 241/90 and subsequent amendments, has unequivocally established that the Public Administration is liable to compensate for unjust damages caused by the intentional or negligent violation of the deadline for concluding administrative proceedings. This is not a concession, but a subjective right of the citizen or company. The delay in issuing enabling titles such as building permits or the failure to complete the SCIA process constitutes a wrongful act that can give rise to compensation for both direct damages, i.e., out-of-pocket expenses incurred unnecessarily during the wait, and lost profits. This latter aspect is fundamental: it refers to the lost earnings that the entrepreneur or private individual would have achieved if the administration had responded within the legally foreseen timeframe, allowing the commencement of economic activity or the sale of properties.
Avv. Marco Bianucci, a lawyer specializing in compensation for damages operating in Milan, adopts a rigorous strategy to address cases of Public Administration liability. The firm's approach is not limited to simply contesting the delay but is based on a detailed analysis of the causal link between the entity's inertia and the economic prejudice suffered by the client. The strategy involves a precise reconstruction of the procedural timeline and an accurate quantification of the financial damage, utilizing technical expert reports where necessary to demonstrate the extent of the lost profits. The goal is to transform a general complaint into a solid and documented compensation claim, prioritizing an out-of-court settlement whenever possible to ensure prompt redress, but without hesitation to resort to the Administrative or Ordinary Judge to defend the client's rights with the utmost firmness.
The right to compensation arises when the Public Administration fails to respect the mandatory deadlines set by law for the conclusion of administrative proceedings (usually 30, 60, or 90 days, depending on the type of application). It is necessary to demonstrate that, had the administration responded promptly, the applicant would have obtained the desired outcome, and that the delay caused direct and quantifiable economic damage.
The calculation of lost profits is a complex operation that requires projecting future earnings that would reasonably have been obtained. In the case of a building permit, reference can be made to the market value of properties that could not be built or sold within the foreseen timeframe, or to lost rental income. For commercial activities stalled by SCIA issues, projected financial statements and average earnings of similar businesses in the same area of Milan are analyzed.
Not necessarily, but the situation varies from case to case. Case law recognizes compensation also for the so-called loss of chance, i.e., the concrete possibility of achieving a beneficial outcome that was lost due to the incorrect conduct of the Public Administration. However, the claim is much stronger if it can be demonstrated that the enabling title was legally due and that the only obstacle was the temporal factor attributable to the entity.
The silence of the Public Administration can have various meanings. In some specific cases, there is silent consent, which is equivalent to the approval of the application. However, in sensitive matters or in the presence of environmental and landscape constraints, silence can be considered a breach of duty. A lawyer specializing in compensation for damages will know how to distinguish between these two scenarios and act accordingly, by formally notifying the administration or challenging the illegitimate silence.
If your business or real estate project is stalled due to bureaucratic delays, do not let time further erode your assets. The Bianucci Law Firm, located at Via Alberto da Giussano 26 in Milan, is at your disposal to analyze your documentation and assess the prerequisites for seeking compensation. Contact Avv. Marco Bianucci for an initial consultation and discover how to protect your interests against administrative inefficiency.