Participating in a board of directors' or statutory auditors' meeting is a fundamental act in a company's life, but it can trigger a criminal investigation if management or accounting irregularities emerge. Discovering after the fact that decisions made collegially concealed illicit acts exposes professionals to serious charges of complicity in corporate crimes. As a criminal lawyer in Milan, lawyer Marco Bianucci daily confronts the complexity of these dynamics, defending directors, auditors, and executives involved in delicate criminal proceedings.
In Italian corporate criminal law, mere physical presence at a meeting or a favorable vote on a resolution does not constitute a crime in itself. The cornerstone of the accusation is the duty to prevent the event: jurisprudence establishes that awareness of irregularities, combined with inaction to prevent them, can establish criminal liability. The crux of the trial therefore focuses on the proof of intent, meaning the rigorous demonstration that the professional had the actual will to commit the illicit act or consciously accepted the risk that it would occur.
Proving the real intention behind silence in a meeting requires deep legal analysis. Often, prosecutor's investigations rely on concise minutes, decontextualized email exchanges, or ambiguous testimonies. It is essential to reconstruct the actual information available to the individual professional at that precise historical moment, clearly distinguishing negligence or inexperience, which may have relevance in civil proceedings, from specific or eventual intent, which forms the basis of criminal liability.
Facing charges for economic crimes requires a meticulous defense strategy based on concrete facts. The approach of lawyer Marco Bianucci, a criminal lawyer in Milan with extensive experience in white-collar defense, focuses on deconstructing the prosecution's case regarding the psychological element of the crime. The Bianucci Law Firm proceeds with a thorough examination of all company documentation, analyzing not only official acts but also real operational dynamics, delegation of functions, and internal communication flows.
The primary objective is to demonstrate the absolute absence of intent, highlighting how the client may have been unaware of machinations due to information asymmetry, corporate compartmentalization, or outright fraud perpetrated by other corporate bodies. Each case is handled with the utmost confidentiality and dedication, building a tailored defense aimed at protecting personal freedom and preserving the professional honor of the client within the economic landscape.
Mere passive participation is not sufficient for a criminal conviction. However, if the prosecution can prove that you were fully aware of the illicit nature of the operations discussed and did nothing to formally express your dissent or prevent the event, you could be charged with complicity in the crime. The dividing line lies in the rigorous proof of your actual knowledge and intent.
The demonstration of the absence of intent is based on a rigorous documentary reconstruction of the operational context. Through the analysis of organizational charts, powers of attorney, email flows, and testimonies, the defense aims to prove that the defendant did not possess the technical or factual elements to understand the illegality of the operation, or that they acted in legitimate reliance on assurances provided by technical consultants or other directors responsible for specific functions.
Members of the board of statutory auditors have a specific duty of control and oversight over the actions of the directors. If they fail to report irregularities they have become aware of, they can be held criminally liable for complicity. Even in these situations, the defense strategy will focus on the actual enforceability of the control in that specific context and on the clear distinction between negligent superficiality in controls and willful connivance with dishonest directors.
Accusations related to corporate crimes can have a devastating impact on a professional's career, assets, and personal life. If you are involved in an investigation concerning board of directors' resolutions or the activities of the board of statutory auditors, it is crucial to act promptly to protect your position. Contact lawyer Marco Bianucci, a criminal lawyer in Milan, at the Bianucci Law Firm at via Alberto da Giussano, 26. During the initial consultation, the details of the case will be analyzed to define the most solid and appropriate defense strategy for your specific situation.