Avv. Marco Bianucci
Avv. Marco Bianucci

Criminal Lawyer

Receiving a notification or a complaint for events that occurred during a police check can cause significant concern. Interactions with law enforcement officers during identification procedures can sometimes lead to tense moments, resulting in verbal disputes that the authority deems damaging to its dignity. In such circumstances, understanding the exact scope of the accusations and your rights is the first crucial step.

As a criminal lawyer in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci fully understands the sensitivity of these moments and the impact that criminal proceedings can have on a person's life. The firm's objective is to provide a clear and rigorous examination of the events, to ensure a solid technical defense from the very first stages of the investigation.

The Crime of Outrage to a Public Official: The Regulatory Framework

In the Italian legal system, the crime of outrage to a public official is governed by Article 341-bis of the Criminal Code. This provision punishes anyone who offends the honor and prestige of a public official while they are performing an official act and because of or in the exercise of their duties. Often, these situations occur precisely during a request to show identification documents or during a roadside check.

Elements Necessary for a Charge

For this crime to be concretely established, jurisprudence requires the simultaneous presence of very specific elements. A simple misplaced word is not enough. The offense must occur in a public place or a place open to the public and, crucially, in the presence of multiple people. If the disputed phrase is uttered privately with the officer, without other unrelated individuals being able to hear it, one of the objective prerequisites for the crime is missing. Furthermore, it is necessary to assess whether there was a justification, such as reacting to an arbitrary act by the public official, although this is a hypothesis that requires rigorous proof.

The Approach of Studio Legale Bianucci in Criminal Defense

Facing an accusation of this type requires meticulous and unbiased analysis. The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, as a criminal lawyer in Milan, is based on a thorough study of every single detail of the matter. Studio Legale Bianucci does not merely read the indictment; it actively works to reconstruct the actual sequence of events.

The defense strategy focuses on a critical evaluation of the statements recorded in the official report, the examination of any witnesses present at the time of identification, and the analysis of the spatial and temporal context. For example, it is assessed whether those present were indeed unrelated third parties or colleagues of the officer on duty, a detail that the Court of Cassation considers with extreme attention for the existence of the crime. The goal is always to bring out the factual truth to protect the client's position in the most effective way possible.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the risks if I uttered offensive phrases during a check?

The penalty provided by Article 341-bis for outrage to a public official is imprisonment from six months to three years. However, the penalty may be increased if the offense consists of attributing a specific fact. It is important to remember that the final sanction depends on multiple factors, including the suspect's criminal record and the procedural strategy adopted.

Is it possible to avoid a criminal trial for outrage?

Yes, the legislator has provided a specific cause for the extinction of the crime for this offense. If the defendant, before the trial, provides reparation for the damage, both to the offended public official and to the entity to which they belong, the crime is extinguished. This is a strategic option that is carefully evaluated by the firm based on the specific circumstances of the case.

What happens if, in addition to the disputed phrases, I refused to provide my documents?

In this scenario, the legal position becomes more complicated. The crime of outrage may be compounded by the misdemeanor provided for by Article 651 of the Criminal Code, namely the refusal to provide information about one's personal identity. Refusing to provide one's personal details to a public official in the exercise of their duties constitutes an independent offense that requires a defense articulated on multiple fronts.

Entrust Your Legal Protection to a Professional

If you find yourself facing a charge for events that occurred during an identification, it is crucial to act promptly to avoid prejudicing your lines of defense. Avv. Marco Bianucci, a criminal lawyer in Milan, is available to listen to your version of events, analyze the documentation you possess, and outline the most appropriate defense strategy for your situation.

The costs and timelines of criminal proceedings depend on the peculiarities of each individual case and the procedural choices that will be made. Contact Studio Legale Bianucci at Via Alberto da Giussano, 26 in Milan, to schedule an in-depth introductory meeting, during which all legal and economic aspects related to your defense will be clearly explained.