Entrusting one's assets to third parties, whether it be a bank for a safe deposit box, a warehouse for goods storage, or temporary storage, presupposes a relationship of trust governed by precise contractual obligations. When this trust is betrayed by the failure to return the asset, its damage, or theft, the depositor suffers a prejudice that goes beyond the mere economic value of the object. As an expert lawyer in damages compensation in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci understands the frustration and difficulties that arise from these situations, offering legal protection aimed at obtaining fair compensation for the loss suffered.
The Italian Civil Code governs the deposit contract, stipulating that the depositary has the obligation to safeguard the item with the diligence of a good family head and to return it when the depositor requests it. The custodian's liability is a central element in these disputes. If the item is not returned, or is returned deteriorated, a presumption of fault arises against the depositary. This means that it is not up to the client to prove the negligence of the bank or warehouse, but it is the custodian who must prove that the loss or damage resulted from a fortuitous and unforeseeable event, absolutely not attributable to their conduct. This principle applies to both gratuitous deposits and, with greater rigor, to onerous ones, as in the case of bank safe deposit boxes or professional logistics deposits.
Avv. Marco Bianucci, with his consolidated experience as an expert lawyer in damages compensation in Milan, approaches cases of non-return or loss of deposited assets with an analytical and rigorous strategy. The first step involves a thorough examination of the deposit contract signed, to identify any unfair terms that unlawfully limit the custodian's liability. Indeed, standard contracts often contain compensation limitations that can be challenged in court. The firm's activity then focuses on the precise quantification of damages, which must include not only the market value of the lost asset (emergent damages), but also any lost profits (lucrum cessans) and, in specific cases, non-pecuniary damages. The goal is to build a solid evidentiary position to negotiate with insurance companies or credit institutions, or to take legal action if a satisfactory agreement is not reached.
Banks often tend to invoke acts of God to absolve themselves of liability in case of theft. However, jurisprudence is very strict: to be released from liability, the institution must prove that it adopted all technologically suitable security measures to prevent the event. If the alarm or surveillance systems were inadequate or malfunctioning, the bank is liable for full compensation. An expert lawyer in damages compensation will be able to assess whether the security measures complied with the required standards.
Proof of the contents is one of the most delicate aspects, given that safe deposit box deposits are secret. In the absence of a certified inventory, presumptive evidence can be used, such as testimonies, dated photographs, previous appraisals, purchase documents, or inheritance declarations that mention the assets. Avv. Marco Bianucci assists clients in collecting and organizing all useful elements to credibly reconstruct the value of the stolen assets.
Yes, the right to compensation is subject to prescription. Generally, for contractual liability, the term is ten years from the date of the breach, i.e., from the date when the asset should have been returned or the theft was discovered. However, it is crucial to act promptly to avoid losing essential evidence and to send formal notices of default that interrupt the prescription periods.
If you have suffered the loss, theft, or damage of assets entrusted to third parties for safekeeping, do not let your rights be ignored. Avv. Marco Bianucci is available at his Milan office, located at Via Alberto da Giussano 26, to analyze your situation and define the best course of action to obtain the compensation you are entitled to.