Many businesses and entrepreneurs in Milan and its province find themselves having to manage complex financial contracts, such as derivatives and swaps, which, instead of acting as a hedge against risks, have turned into sources of substantial economic losses. Often, these products are offered by credit institutions without transparent information on the real underlying risks and the hidden costs that burden the client from the moment of signing. Understanding the nature of these instruments is the first step in assessing whether there are grounds for legal action. As a lawyer specializing in compensation for damages in the financial sector, it is crucial to analyze whether the bank has complied with the information and fairness obligations imposed by current legislation at the time of contract signing.
The Italian and European regulatory framework, particularly the MiFID directive, imposes strict transparency and appropriateness obligations on financial intermediaries. The most recent case law, including that of the United Sections of the Court of Cassation, has clarified that a derivative contract, to be valid, must clearly state the rational risk, i.e., the calculable risk that the parties assume, and the implicit costs. If the bank has not communicated the mark-to-market (the fair value of the derivative) or has applied hidden commissions that unbalance the agreement exclusively in its favor, the contract can be declared null and void. This nullity opens the way for the refund of all sums unduly paid by the company over the years. The violation of conduct obligations by the credit institution represents the legal basis for claiming compensation for damages suffered by the non-professional investor.
Facing litigation against a banking institution requires a meticulous procedural strategy and a deep technical knowledge of financial matters. The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, a lawyer specializing in compensation for damages from banking misconduct in Milan, always begins with a preliminary examination of the contractual documentation. The Bianucci Law Firm collaborates with high-profile financial technical consultants to prepare econometric reports capable of mathematically demonstrating the imbalance of the contract and the presence of undisclosed costs. We do not limit ourselves to contesting the formal validity of the agreement but aim to demonstrate the concrete absence of the contract's cause, often sold as a hedge but structured as a speculative bet. The goal is to achieve the maximum result for the client, prioritizing quick out-of-court settlements where possible, but ensuring a robust defense in court if necessary to protect corporate assets.
Compensation or refund of sums can be obtained when it is proven that the contract is null and void due to a lack of essential elements, such as the indication of hidden costs or the mark-to-market, or when the bank has violated information obligations, inducing the client to sign a product not suitable for their risk profile. A technical analysis is necessary to ascertain these defects.
Hidden costs are charges implicit in the contract that the bank collects immediately upon signing but does not explicitly declare to the client. These costs result in an initial negative value of the derivative for the client and a positive value for the bank, creating a contractual imbalance that, if not agreed upon, makes the contract contestable.
Yes, generally the right to the refund of unduly paid sums is subject to a ten-year statute of limitations. However, the starting point of the period may vary depending on whether it is a case of contract nullity or damages for breach of contract. It is crucial to consult a professional promptly to interrupt the statute of limitations and not lose the right to take action.
Banks often have companies sign declarations in which the company states it is a qualified operator to avoid more stringent information obligations. However, if this declaration does not correspond to the company's actual financial expertise and turns out to be a mere boilerplate clause, case law tends not to consider it valid, still allowing for investor protection.
If your company has signed derivative or swap contracts and you believe you have suffered unjust losses, it is essential to act with awareness and promptly. Avv. Marco Bianucci, thanks to his consolidated experience as a lawyer specializing in financial damages compensation, is available to analyze your situation and assess the possibilities of recovering the sums paid. The Bianucci Law Firm receives clients in Milan at Via Alberto da Giussano, 26, offering concrete and results-oriented legal support for the protection of your corporate assets.