One of the most delicate issues and a source of major conflicts during a marital crisis concerns the fate of the family home. Often, clients who turn to Studio Legale Bianucci ask a crucial question: who will continue to live in the house after the separation? There is widespread confusion between the concept of property ownership and that of assignment of the family home. As a divorce lawyer in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci frequently encounters how this uncertainty generates unfounded fears: on one hand, the owner fears losing their asset permanently; on the other, the custodial parent fears being evicted from the home overnight.
It is fundamental to understand that the right of ownership and the right of residence (assignment) run on parallel but distinct tracks. The objective of this guide is to clarify the current regulations to allow for conscious management of real estate assets during separation or divorce.
To understand the substantial difference, one must analyze the legal nature of the two institutions. Ownership is a real right concerning the title of the property. If the house was purchased by only one of the spouses, they remain the sole owner even after the separation. If it is jointly owned, both remain holders of their respective shares. Separation, in itself, does not alter the ownership of the asset.
The assignment of the family home, on the other hand, is a measure that the judge adopts in the exclusive interest of the offspring (minor children or adult children who are not economically self-sufficient). The Civil Code establishes that the enjoyment of the family home is granted by primarily considering the interest of the children. This means that the judge will assign the right to live in the house to the parent with whom the children predominantly live (the custodial parent), regardless of who owns the property.
Consequently, it may happen that the sole owner of the house (e.g., the father) has to leave the property to allow the children to continue living there with the other parent (e.g., the mother), while still retaining ownership of the asset. This right of enjoyment, however, is not eternal and is not a right of ownership: it is instrumental to the protection of the children and ceases when the conditions are no longer met (e.g., when the children become independent or change residence).
Addressing the issue of the family home requires a strategy that balances the protection of minors with the safeguarding of real estate assets. Avv. Marco Bianucci, an expert lawyer in family law in Milan, analyzes each case with extreme attention to documentary details and family dynamics.
The firm's approach focuses on a preliminary assessment: before undertaking any legal action, the title of ownership, the potential presence of outstanding mortgages, and the financial situation of the parties are examined. The goal is not only to obtain or contest the assignment but to integrate this element into a broader framework of the economic arrangement of the separation. For example, if the client is the owner who must leave the house, Avv. Marco Bianucci will work to ensure that this economic sacrifice is adequately considered in the calculation of the maintenance allowance, guaranteeing a balance between the parties.
Furthermore, the firm pays particular attention to the transcription of the assignment order. This technical step is crucial to make the right of residence enforceable against third parties, protecting the parent and children from any potential sale of the property that could jeopardize their housing stability.
Yes, the owner retains the right to sell the property. However, whoever purchases the house must respect the assignment order until its revocation. In practical terms, the property is sold "occupied" by the custodial parent and children, which inevitably leads to a reduction in market value and greater difficulty in finding buyers interested in immediate use of the property.
As a rule, the mortgage is borne by the owner (or co-owners) regardless of who lives in the house, unless otherwise agreed between the parties. Regarding condominium fees, case law tends to distinguish: ordinary expenses (related to use, such as heating and stair cleaning) are the responsibility of the assignee living in the house, while extraordinary expenses (roof repairs, facade) remain the owner's responsibility.
In the absence of minor children or adult children who are not self-sufficient, the conditions for the assignment of the family home are not met. In this scenario, the house returns to the full availability of the owner. If the property is jointly owned, it will be necessary to proceed with the division of the asset (sale to a third party with division of proceeds or purchase of the other spouse's share).
No. The right of assignment can be revoked if the conditions are no longer met. The main causes for revocation are: the children become economically self-sufficient or move elsewhere, or the assignee ceases to live permanently in the house, enters into a cohabitation, or remarries. In these cases, Avv. Marco Bianucci can assist the owner in filing a request for the revocation of the assignment.
The management of the family home is one of the most economically significant aspects of a separation. Errors in judgment at this stage can lead to significant financial losses or precarious housing situations. If you have doubts about your position as an owner or as a custodial parent, it is essential to rely on a competent professional.
Studio Legale Bianucci, located in Milan at Via Alberto da Giussano 26, is at your disposal to analyze your specific situation. Avv. Marco Bianucci will guide you in understanding your rights, working towards a solution that protects your future and that of your children.