Entrusting one's children to a school institution implies a relationship of extreme trust, based on the certainty that their health and safety will be preserved at all times of the day, including the canteen service. When a traumatic event such as anaphylactic shock occurs due to a known but improperly managed food allergy, parents' sense of bewilderment and concern is understandable and legitimate. As a lawyer specializing in compensation for damages in Milan, Avv. Marco Bianucci deeply understands the gravity of these situations, which do not only concern legal aspects but touch upon the most intimate sphere of family safety.
The management of food allergies in schools is not a mere courtesy but a precise regulatory duty. When this duty is neglected, causing harm to the minor's health, scenarios of civil and, sometimes, criminal liability arise that require careful and rigorous analysis. The aim of this resource is to provide clarity to families on how Italian law protects minors in these circumstances and what steps are necessary to obtain justice.
The responsibility of the school institution and the canteen staff is based on both the Civil Code and specific food safety regulations. Enrollment in school and the use of the canteen service establish a contractual relationship whereby the entity undertakes to ensure the student's safety and well-being. In particular, Article 2048 of the Civil Code governs so-called culpa in vigilando, i.e., the responsibility of teachers and school staff for damages suffered by students under their supervision.
In the specific case of anaphylactic shock, liability is aggravated if the family has duly communicated the allergy and provided the necessary medical documentation, often integrated into a protocol or individual health plan. If the school or catering company administers the allergenic food despite the notification, serious negligence is established. Case law is clear in defining that the entity managing the canteen must guarantee rigorous procedures to avoid contamination or incorrect administration, and failure to comply with these procedures is a direct source of compensatory liability.
Addressing a lawsuit for school negligence requires technical expertise and sensitivity. The approach of Avv. Marco Bianucci, a lawyer specializing in civil liability in Milan, is distinguished by a meticulous analysis of the evidentiary documentation. The first fundamental step is to reconstruct the chain of events: from the certification of the allergy presented by the parents, to the procedures adopted by the canteen, up to the management of the health emergency at the time of the allergic reaction.
Studio Legale Bianucci works to ascertain not only the direct responsibility of those who administered the food but also any organizational deficiencies of the institution or the catering company. The legal strategy aims to quantify precisely and comprehensively all categories of damages. This involves not only compensating for temporary or permanent biological damage suffered by the child but also for moral and existential damage resulting from the trauma experienced, as well as the suffering endured by the parents themselves. As a lawyer specializing in compensation for damages, Avv. Marco Bianucci pursues the goal of obtaining compensation commensurate with the severity of the incident, favoring quick and effective out-of-court settlements where possible, but without hesitation in proceeding to litigation to protect the minor's rights.
The school's responsibility is primarily based on knowledge of the risk. If the allergy has not been formally communicated through medical certificates and specific forms, proving the institution's negligence becomes very complex. However, if the allergy was known de facto or if the reaction was caused by spoiled food harmful to anyone, there may be different grounds for liability that a lawyer specializing in compensation for damages will need to assess on a case-by-case basis.
To build a solid case, it is essential to gather all medical documentation relating to the pre-existing allergy and that from the emergency room following the anaphylactic shock. It is also crucial to obtain copies of correspondence with the school (emails, canteen enrollment forms, certificates submitted) proving that the food issue was reported. Witness testimonies may also be useful.
Often, liability is joint and several. Even if the service is contracted out, the school retains a duty of supervision (culpa in vigilando) over the actions of suppliers within its premises. Legal action can be directed against both the catering company, the direct perpetrator of the error, and the school institution or municipal body responsible for the service, to maximize the chances of compensation.
Yes, our legal system recognizes the indirect damage suffered by relatives. Seeing one's child in mortal danger due to anaphylactic shock generates inner suffering and disruption of life habits that can be quantified and compensated as moral damage and parental damage, in addition to the compensation due directly to the minor for the injuries sustained.
If your child has suffered consequences due to the mismanagement of food allergies at school, it is crucial to act promptly to protect their rights. Studio Legale Bianucci is available to examine the details of the situation with the utmost confidentiality and professionalism. Contact Avv. Marco Bianucci at the Milan office at Via Alberto da Giussano, 26, to schedule an initial consultation and understand the best course of action to obtain fair compensation.