Receiving a notice of investigation for making false statements in a self-certification or a statutory declaration is an event that causes understandable concern. Often, these situations arise from bureaucratic oversights or compilation errors, but the Italian legal system treats them with extreme severity. Understanding the gravity of the accusation is the first step in organizing an effective defense. As a criminal lawyer in Milan, the goal is to analyze every detail of the documentation to protect your legal position and your criminal record.
The Italian legal system, through Presidential Decree 445/2000, has simplified relations between citizens and the Public Administration by allowing the use of self-certifications and substitute declarations of statutory declarations. However, this trust granted to citizens is balanced by rigorous sanctions in case of abuse. Anyone who falsely attests to statuses, personal qualities, or facts in a document intended for public authority commits a crime against public faith. The most common offense invoked is that provided for by Article 483 of the Criminal Code, which punishes ideological falsehood committed by a private individual in a public document.
It is crucial to emphasize that the crime is consummated at the very moment the false declaration is submitted or signed, regardless of whether the perpetrator derives any actual benefit from it. The law punishes the violation of public faith, i.e., the trust that the community places in the veracity of documents that have evidentiary value. Penalties can range from imprisonment for up to two years, or higher penalties if the act concerns civil status documents, in addition to the immediate forfeiture of any benefits obtained thanks to the mendacious declaration.
Facing proceedings for falsehood in self-certification requires a meticulous and technical defense strategy. The approach of lawyer Marco Bianucci, an expert criminal law attorney in Milan, focuses not only on the objective fact but, above all, on the subjective element of the crime, namely intent (dolo). For a conviction, the prosecution must prove that the citizen knowingly lied with the intention to deceive the administration.
Many cases handled by the firm arise from good-faith errors, misinterpretations of complex forms, or unintentional omissions. The defense strategy often aims to demonstrate the absence of deceptive intent, an essential element for the crime to be constituted. Through defensive investigations and technical briefs, we work to highlight the nature of the error, aiming, where possible, for the dismissal of the proceedings or acquittal due to the non-existence of the fact or its particular insignificance. In-depth knowledge of the procedural dynamics of the Court of Milan allows for a realistic assessment of the chances of success and the selection of the most advantageous procedural route for the client.
If the false declaration is the result of a mere material error or a misunderstanding of the form, intent (dolo), meaning the will to lie, may be absent. In such cases, a criminal lawyer will work to demonstrate good faith, an element that can lead to acquittal or dismissal, as the crime of ideological falsehood requires awareness of the falsity.
Yes, as it is a criminal offense (a felony, not a misdemeanor), any final conviction is entered into the judicial records. This can have significant repercussions on one's professional and personal life, which is why it is essential to rely on an experienced lawyer to attempt to avoid such a consequence or limit the damage through mechanisms such as probation.
In certain circumstances, if the act is considered minor and the conduct is not habitual, it is possible to request the application of the cause for non-punishability due to the particular insignificance of the act (Art. 131-bis of the Criminal Code). Alternatively, alternative paths such as the suspension of proceedings with probation can be considered, which, if successful, leads to the extinction of the crime.
In addition to criminal consequences, the law provides for immediate administrative sanctions. Article 75 of Presidential Decree 445/2000 establishes the forfeiture of any benefits obtained as a result of the measure issued based on the untrue declaration. This means, for example, that one will lose their place in a ranking, subsidy, or authorization obtained.
If you are involved in proceedings for untrue declarations or fear the consequences of an erroneous self-certification, it is crucial to act promptly. Contact lawyer Marco Bianucci for a preliminary assessment of your situation. The firm, located at Via Alberto da Giussano 26 in Milan, offers discreet and highly qualified assistance to protect your rights and your future.