Commentary on Judgment No. 45816 of 2024: Opposition to a Criminal Conviction Order and Installment Payment of Pecuniary Penalty

Judgment No. 45816 of 2024, filed on December 13, 2024, offers an important clarification on the matter of opposition to a criminal conviction order, particularly concerning the installment payment of pecuniary penalties. This decision, issued by the Court of Cassation, represents a fundamental reference point for understanding the rights of defendants and the applicable legal procedures.

Context of the Judgment

The Court declared inadmissible the appeal against the order rejecting the request for installment payment of the pecuniary penalty submitted in opposition to a criminal conviction order. It is important to emphasize that, according to the Court, such an order is unappealable. In other words, the defendant does not have the possibility to contest the rejection of the installment payment request at that specific stage of the proceedings.

The Ruling of the Judgment

“(EXCLUSIVITY) - Opposition to a criminal conviction order - Request for installment payment of pecuniary penalty - Rejection order - Appealability - Exclusion. The order rejecting the request for installment payment of the pecuniary penalty submitted in opposition to a criminal conviction order is unappealable. (In its reasoning, the Court specified that the request can instead be made in the proceedings following the opposition or directly to the supervisory judge pursuant to art. 660, paragraph 3, second period, of the Code of Criminal Procedure).

This ruling highlights a crucial aspect: the impossibility of contesting the rejection of the installment payment request within the context of the opposition. However, the Court clarifies that the defendant still has the possibility to submit the request at a later stage, in the proceedings following the opposition, or directly to the supervisory judge. This implies that, although the rejection cannot be appealed, alternative channels exist to obtain installment payments.

Legal and Procedural Implications

The decision of the Court of Cassation is part of a clear regulatory framework that provides for the exclusivity of appeal remedies in criminal matters. This exclusivity is established by art. 568 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which stipulates that the methods of appeal must be specifically indicated and limited.

• Installment payment of pecuniary penalties can also be requested at a later stage than the opposition.
• The supervisory judge plays a key role in managing installment payment requests.
• It is essential for defendants to be informed about the correct procedures to avoid legal complications.

In conclusion, judgment No. 45816 of 2024 reminds us of the importance of following correct procedures in criminal proceedings. Defendants must be aware of the limitations imposed by law, but also of the opportunities available to seek more favorable solutions.

Conclusions

The Court of Cassation, with this judgment, has clarified a fundamental aspect of Italian criminal law, reinforcing the exclusivity of appeal remedies and providing clear guidance on how to proceed in cases where installment payments of pecuniary penalties are necessary. It is therefore essential for legal professionals and defendants to fully understand the implications of this decision.